NbS Triple Win Toolkit: Biodiversity Indicators in Context 41 The recommendations recognise the difficulties of capturing thevariety of biodiversity impacts from a broad range of interventions.It should also be noted that there are additional areas that have not been considered within the recommendations above but could also enhance a suite of indicators. People and nature The level of engagement between people and their natural environment is increasingly recognised as important, both for people’s well-being, and to increase the likelihood of success in achieving ecosystem restoration. As such, indicators of people’s engagement with nature are incorporated into biodiversity frameworks, such as Defra’s 25 Year Environment Plan (YEP) or CBD (see Box 2 for examples). Considering these kinds of indicators has not been within the scope of this work, which has concentrated on direct benefits to biodiversity, but couldbe an informative part of any biodiversity indicator suite, particularly where the societal benefits are also a priority. Information gaps Box 1 Examples of indicators considering interactionsbetween people and nature Defra’s 25 Year Environment Plan includes: Engagement with the natural environment People engaged in social action for the environment Environmental attitudes and behaviours Health and wellbeing benefits CBD Aichi Target 1 “…people are aware of the values of biodiversity and the steps they can take to conserve and use it sustainably”, including possible indicators under the headings of “Trends in awareness and attitudes to biodiversity” and “Trends in public engagement with biodiversity”.Specific potential indicators listed include: UEBT Biodiversity Barometer Online interest in biodiversity (Google Trends) WAZA global visitor survey