NbS Triple Win Toolkit: Evidence Base 106 External databases hosting the case studies were selected to provide examples of NbS implementation in ODA-eligible countries, with additional databases included to increase the evidence base for urban examples. This selective evidence base represents NbS implementation in this defined context and does not necessarily represent global NbS implementation. When the Database of NbS Case Studies is filtered to projects inODA-eligible countries (283 projects), it can be used to understand trends which could be confirmed from literature review and expert consultation. Of the NbS projects assessed in ODA-eligible countries: The following sections provide further analysis and conclusions whichcan be drawn from the Database of NbS Case Studies. Statistics from the database of NbS case studies The triple win in ODA-eligible countries The specification of objectives for biodiversity enhancement, climate change mitigation and/or adaptation and poverty reduction were recorded for NbS case studies which passed JNCC’s selection criteria. This table shows the percentage of case studies in ODA-eligible countries (283 projects) which were recorded as ‘unspecified’, ‘qualitised’, ‘quantified’ or ‘monetised’ for each of the three objectivesin the triple win. This highlights that monetisation of benefits is largely lacking, particularly for biodiversity related objectives. Of the projects selected for review, those with objectives for poverty reduction or biodiversity enhancement often used quantified metrics. The higher percentage here does not reflect quality of the indicator used. Metrics were mostly area-based proxies or reflective of activities rather than outcomes.The literature review, expert evidence, and biodiversity indicators review suggest biodiversity metrics are often inadequate, relyingon activity-based rather than outcomes-based indicators. Climate change and biodiversity also had higher proportions of objectivesthat were unspecified – meaning the project did not mentionbenefits related to that objective. 67% specified benefitsfor biodiversity, climate, and people. 64% were in the terrestrial environment. 58% were ongoing and yet to be completed. Biodiversity enhancement objective (%) Climate mitigation and/or adaptation objective (%) Poverty reduction objective (%) Unspecified 19.4 20.8 9.5 Qualitised 29.3 38.9 32.2 Quantified 50.9 38.2 54.1 Monetised 0.4 2.1 4.2