Technip Energies (79/100)

Technip EnergiesTechnip Energies (79/100)Technip Energies - (1/100)Technip Energies - (2/100)Technip Energies - (3/100)Technip Energies - (4/100)Technip Energies - (5/100)Technip Energies - (6/100)Technip Energies - (7/100)Technip Energies - (8/100)Technip Energies - (9/100)Technip Energies - (10/100)Technip Energies - (11/100)Technip Energies - (12/100)Technip Energies - (13/100)Technip Energies - (14/100)Technip Energies - (15/100)Technip Energies - (16/100)Technip Energies - (17/100)Technip Energies - (18/100)Technip Energies - (19/100)Technip Energies - (20/100)Technip Energies - (21/100)Technip Energies - (22/100)Technip Energies - (23/100)Technip Energies - (24/100)Technip Energies - (25/100)Technip Energies - (26/100)Technip Energies - (27/100)Technip Energies - (28/100)Technip Energies - (29/100)Technip Energies - (30/100)Technip Energies - (31/100)Technip Energies - (32/100)Technip Energies - (33/100)Technip Energies - (34/100)Technip Energies - (35/100)Technip Energies - (36/100)Technip Energies - (37/100)Technip Energies - (38/100)Technip Energies - (39/100)Technip Energies - (40/100)Technip Energies - (41/100)Technip Energies - (42/100)Technip Energies - (43/100)Technip Energies - (44/100)Technip Energies - (45/100)Technip Energies - (46/100)Technip Energies - (47/100)Technip Energies - (48/100)Technip Energies - (49/100)Technip Energies - (50/100)Technip Energies - (51/100)Technip Energies - (52/100)Technip Energies - (53/100)Technip Energies - (54/100)Technip Energies - (55/100)Technip Energies - (56/100)Technip Energies - (57/100)Technip Energies - (58/100)Technip Energies - (59/100)Technip Energies - (60/100)Technip Energies - (61/100)Technip Energies - (62/100)Technip Energies - (63/100)Technip Energies - (64/100)Technip Energies - (65/100)Technip Energies - (66/100)Technip Energies - (67/100)Technip Energies - (68/100)Technip Energies - (69/100)Technip Energies - (70/100)Technip Energies - (71/100)Technip Energies - (72/100)Technip Energies - (73/100)Technip Energies - (74/100)Technip Energies - (75/100)Technip Energies - (76/100)Technip Energies - (77/100)Technip Energies - (78/100)Technip Energies - (79/100)Technip Energies - (80/100)Technip Energies - (81/100)Technip Energies - (82/100)Technip Energies - (83/100)Technip Energies - (84/100)Technip Energies - (85/100)Technip Energies - (86/100)Technip Energies - (87/100)Technip Energies - (88/100)Technip Energies - (89/100)Technip Energies - (90/100)Technip Energies - (91/100)Technip Energies - (92/100)Technip Energies - (93/100)Technip Energies - (94/100)Technip Energies - (95/100)Technip Energies - (96/100)Technip Energies - (97/100)Technip Energies - (98/100)Technip Energies - (99/100)Technip Energies - (100/100) Consulting & Products Consulting & Products Offshore CFD/ NWB TYPICAL DEPLOYMENT TYPICAL DEPLOYMENT project experience project experience references references 2022@TechnipEnergies - All rights reserved Complimentary method to physical model tests allowing to reproduce the environmental loads and responses from physical model tests, and to further scale up to the real ocean environment. Successful CFD use in offshore platform design requires well established CFD modelling practices for each specific application area. Computational Fluid Dynamics/ Numerical Wave Basin Typical Deployment Project experience References Technip Energies has been closely working with operators to establish CFD practices in the areas of current load, VIM (Vortex Induced Motion), wind load, global performance in waves, green water, air gap and wave impact for FPSO, Semisubmersible, TLP and Spar. Then, the practices are documented and verified, and their reproducibility confirmed. Chevron Semisubmersible Vortex Induced Motion Benchmark, 2013-2016; BP Semisubmersible Vortex Induced Motion & Riser VIV, 2013; ExxonMobil URC FPSO Drag / Damping Validation, 2015-2016; Shell FLNG Turret Moonpool Analysis, 2017; Energean Karish FPSO Global Performance, Greenwater and Mooring Load, 2018 & Many Others. H. Jang, J. Kyoung, J. Kim, H. Yan, G. Wu, 2017, ‘CFD Study of Fully Coupled Mooring and Riser Effects on Vortex-Induced Motion of Sem-submersible,’ 36th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2017- 62433, Trondheim, Norway. J. Kim, H. Jang, W. Xu, Z. Shen, M. Kara, S. Yeon, H. Yen, 2018, Numerical Modeling of Neutrally-Stable and Sustainable Atmospheric Boundary Layer for the Wind Load Estimation on an Offshore Platform, 37th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2018-78699, Madrid, Spain. A. Baquet, H. Jang, H.J. Lim, J. Kyoung, N. Tcherniguin, T. Lefebvre, J. Kim, 2019, ‘CFD- Based Numerical Wave Basin for FPSO in Irregular Waves,’ 38th Int. Conf. on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2019- 96838, Glasgow, Scotland.